Andrew “Drew” Senyei, MD, is a medical physician who has spent a lot of his life beginning and rising biotechnology firms. He spent 25 years as managing director of Enterprise Companions Enterprise Capital and was the founding investor in Nuvasive, a non-invasive orthopedic firm. At present, he serves as government chair of NeoSeq, an organization that focuses on superior genetic testing for most cancers and different illnesses.
Senyei is a member of a dialogue group to which I additionally belong, and his wide-ranging accomplishments and interdisciplinary information are nicely revered. I spoke with him just lately in regards to the novel coronavirus epidemic. (Right here we use “coronavirus” to check with each the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the illness it causes, COVID-19.) He provided his ideas on the place issues stand at present and what could be achieved to counteract the disaster within the coming weeks and months. His views are his personal and don’t mirror these of any establishment with which he’s related.
What follows is a evenly edited transcript of our dialogue.
Laurence B. Siegel: Give me a rundown in your eager about the novel coronavirus or COVID-19 state of affairs. We’ve got heard each doable standpoint, starting from, on one excessive, simply letting it occur in order that we develop herd immunity, to, on the opposite excessive, taking draconian measures that lock individuals down and cease the economic system to inhibit the unfold of the illness, or “flatten the curve.”
Drew Senyei, MD: Let me start by saying that our information of this explicit virus is about 13 weeks outdated. We sequenced it, we all know a number of the proteins in it, however its biology — the way it behaves in people, who will get sick, who doesn’t, can we make a vaccine or not — all these issues are unknowns. We’ve got lived with numerous coronaviruses for a very long time, however what’s now clear is that this coronavirus could be very completely different from the earlier coronaviruses that turned epidemics, comparable to SARS and MERS. However we don’t understand how completely different, both quantitatively or qualitatively, so we’re coping with projections and guesses on a wide range of main parameters.
Essentially the most rapid unknown is how deadly that is. That’s associated to one thing known as the case fatality price (CFR). That’s merely the quantity of people that die of the illness, expressed as a proportion of the quantity of people that have it. The issue is that the denominator could be very poorly estimated, for a number of causes. One is that we haven’t examined everybody, particularly asymptomatic sufferers. This virus is especially infectious as a result of many individuals who’ve it and might transmit it are asymptomatic, and we actually do not know what number of of them there are.
As well as, the reporting of deaths on this nation isn’t good in that some individuals who died from this additionally produce other causes of demise. They usually have most cancers or coronary heart illness, so the query is, Did the virus kill them or did the most cancers or coronary heart illness kill them? That may be troublesome to establish. They’re often coded within the medical report as viral pneumonias or acute respiratory misery. So the information are noisy.
The CFR helps us determine, Is that this just like the common flu, with a CFR of 0.02%, or is it one thing worse? The perfect guesses proper now are that this isn’t the bizarre flu. But it surely’s not SARS with a CFR of 9.6% or MERS with a catastrophic price of 35% both. Additionally, the measured CFRs for SARS and MERS had been a lot, a lot greater within the early a part of the pandemics than they had been after the pandemic subsided.
So we’re sort of constructing a aircraft as we’re flying it. We simply don’t know the numbers. Whenever you don’t know one thing, you overreact in an abundance of warning. Proper now the very best estimate of case fatality I’ve seen was in an unlucky Petri dish experiment known as The Diamond Princess.
It’s a cruise ship that had 3,711 individuals onboard. Apparently, just one individual had the virus once they obtained on the ship, then a really massive quantity contracted it — 705 examined optimistic — so we have now a managed experiment. The outcome was that nobody below 70 died. When you think about that they had been truly in a confined situation and the way contagious this virus is — it survives on surfaces generally for days . . .
That appears like a reasonably good end result. Excellent truly.
Of these 705, half had been asymptomatic. We all know that we’re not testing all of the asymptomatic sufferers right here within the US or anyplace else. So the denominator of the CFR is far, a lot bigger than the depend of individuals with lively illness.
In order that signifies that the precise CFR is far decrease than the measured CFR, doesn’t it?
Sure, however it’s a must to go just a little deeper than simply a mean CFR. It’s a must to go to each age-adjusted and well being care–system–adjusted CFRs as a result of this virus is clearly far more deadly in individuals over 70 than in individuals below 70.
Okay, however earlier than you do this, are you able to clarify how this virus works and why it may be so deadly?
The liner in our lungs and intestines consists of epithelial cells that block many dangerous pathogens from getting into the physique. The brand new virus (SARS-CoV-2) developed a particular spike protein (consider it like a key) that attaches to a receptor on these cells (consider it like a lock) that permits it entry to our physique. If a virus doesn’t have the correct key, it can’t get in.
As soon as inside, it replicates itself many occasions by hijacking our cells’ regular equipment. It then bursts out to contaminate many different cells, inflicting our immune system to enter overdrive to attempt to fight it. Usually, our immune response stays in test and solely kills the invader. Nevertheless, on this case our physique overreacts and begins harming our regular cells. The irritation injures primarily our lungs but additionally different organs, together with our coronary heart, main these sufferers to develop into very sick with multi-organ failure in a short time.
As soon as the lungs develop into flooded with inflammatory merchandise, they can not trade oxygen very nicely and require superior mechanical air flow. That is known as acute respiratory misery syndrome (ARDS) and requires very expert medical doctors and nurses in ICUs [intensive-care units] to handle these sufferers. The ventilators help the sufferers and permit the lungs time to heal.
Sadly, as soon as a affected person is intubated and on a ventilator, the demise price could be very excessive, however we don’t but know why. Even those that survive keep within the ICU for much longer than different essential sufferers. The ICU mattress turnover for these sufferers is so much longer, so it’s not simply the variety of beds obtainable, but additionally the size of keep that strains well being care assets and personnel.
Let’s have a look at Italy and South Korea, the place hopefully you’ll be able to consider the numbers. Italy and South Korea have about the identical variety of optimistic sufferers. Italy’s case fatality price was one thing like 6.6% at one time, and South Korea’s 0.2%. You go down another layer and ask what the case fatality price was for individuals over age 80, and Italy’s is nineteen% and South Korea’s is 3%. However for those who have a look at the 20- to 29-year-olds, the case fatality in South Korea is 29% and three.7% in Italy. So it’s precisely backwards from what it’s for individuals over 80.
The Italy-South Korea CFRs span a spread of 33 to 1! What good is that this measure with numbers like this? And, a CFR of 29% for individuals of their 20s is big. How can that be?
Once more, these are incomplete statistics, since you don’t know the denominator. You don’t understand how lots of the 20- to 29-year-olds obtained examined. There are in all probability much more of them on the market with COVID-19 than those who obtained sick sufficient to get examined.
The way in which that numerous nations take a look at is completely different too. Some, like South Korea, take a look at everyone, and a few solely take a look at symptomatic sufferers. So the bias of your sampling is mostly a operate of the well being care system, the reporting and assets, entry to testing, and so forth.
In previous epidemics or pandemics like SARS and MERS, we noticed a excessive preliminary CFR, after which it dropped significantly. Nobody is aware of, however the numbers I’m seeing point out a CFR of 0.5% to 1%. However this may change as extra testing is completed.
Contemplating how many individuals should be contaminated to realize herd immunity, that’s nonetheless loads of deaths until you imply merely the accelerated deaths of the very outdated and really sick. Let me undergo a couple of numbers. If it takes 50% of the US inhabitants, which is 50% of 330 million or 165 million individuals, to realize herd immunity — that’s, the place everybody you’re prone to meet is both recovered or immune within the first place — and also you then multiply by your low CFR variety of 0.5%, that’s 825,000 deaths.
Am I in the correct ballpark doing the calculation this manner? Are these incremental deaths, on high of the roughly 3 million individuals who die every year within the US anyway? Or are lots of them actually a reclassification of the deaths of the outdated and sick to COVID-19 who would die from another trigger, together with the flu?
An incremental 825,000 deaths could be a disaster. “Solely” 58,000 largely younger individuals died within the Vietnam Warfare over a interval of years and it turned the nation the wrong way up and altered our overseas coverage perpetually.
Your calculations are mathematically appropriate however are related provided that your beginning assumption of CFR is appropriate and social distancing has zero affect. However social distancing is having a really optimistic affect!
My guess is that the CFR will fall beneath what we’re guessing now, however we have no idea how far beneath. It will likely be decided by how nicely we stop overwhelming our well being care amenities and personnel and the way quickly we develop a therapy. The seasonal influenza CFR is round 0.1% and 20,000 to 60,000 individuals die in a given 12 months, but we don’t shut the economic system down due to it. Nevertheless, as a result of COVID-19 has already unfold to so many locations, we would like the density of recent instances presenting in any geographic space at any given time to be as little as doable and over as lengthy a time interval as doable to stop a surge on the well being care system.
I need to point out testing as a result of that’s what I’ve been doing most of my life. There was loads of mishandling within the early a part of this by the federal government. The CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] wouldn’t settle for the World Well being Group (WHO) take a look at, which was developed in Germany, as a result of they didn’t really feel it was correct sufficient. That is likely to be true and it may need been the correct factor, however doing the correct factor meant that we delayed testing considerably. So we couldn’t estimate the denominator very simply. And we’re nonetheless behind. That’s Level 1.
Level 2 is that the FDA [US Food and Drug Administration] issued what’s known as Emergency Use Authorization, which implies labs may develop their very own home-brewed exams, so we’re getting all kinds of various tools and exams. I predict there will likely be extra testing within the US within the subsequent month than there was on the planet within the final month, due to the variety of producers who’re arising a spread of exams.
And so they all have what’s known as analytical validity, which the FDA requires. Which means that for those who do the take a look at in your lab on a specimen 100 occasions, then you definately get the identical outcomes 100 occasions.
However we don’t know what the medical validity is — which is, How does this take a look at behave in the true world? So for instance, whenever you pattern your nostril and the again of your mouth, how is that pattern achieved by completely different people? Some go greater, some go decrease. How lengthy is that pattern sitting round earlier than it’s shipped to the lab? Does it go someplace the place it will get frozen, then heated? How a lot degradation of the RNA virus takes place earlier than it’s analyzed?
Then we have now to know that the affected person you took it from is a real optimistic. The third drawback is that reporting differs throughout states. Some states report positives solely, some report positives and negatives. We’ve got a patchwork of knowledge methods — the Nationwide Influenza Database, CDC/NIH, personal monitoring of this stuff. So we don’t have a single uniform nationwide normal that everybody is adhering to.
Why is it thought-about acceptable to report positives and never negatives? In any investigative area, for those who search for one thing and don’t discover it, you’re imagined to report that to save lots of different individuals the difficulty of taking place the identical useless finish. Whether or not your report ever will get printed is, after all, one other matter . . .
Welcome to the true world. There may be loads of point-of-care testing happening, utilizing many alternative methods. There are over 100 firms now began for testing for coronavirus. We might not want all of those 100 firms, however we’ll in all probability want 20 — as a result of we’re going to wish to repeatedly take a look at. Not only for this virus, however for all of the respiratory viruses as a result of it’s so exhausting to discriminate between a daily flu and COVID-19 on preliminary presentation. The signs overlap. So it’s a must to take a look at for influenza A/B, parainfluenza, all of the respiratory viruses on the market, ideally on the identical time, so we may also help with the differential prognosis of COVID-19 versus different respiratory viruses.
If we truly had been in a position to try this, it could be probably the most helpful solution to take a look at since you may then attribute the incremental fatality that’s due solely to COVID-19. The issue with that’s co-infections: You will get each the common flu and COVID. After which, to complicate it extra, there are secondary bacterial infections. You’re compromised to combat a bacterium, so individuals usually die of bacterial sepsis as a substitute of the virus. So we’d like higher testing and extra testing, primarily for triage functions. We have to understand how a lot of the illness is on the market so we will have the well being care assets and physicians to answer that surge, the place and if it happens.
The priority that retains me up at night time isn’t getting the illness, however the social prices of the “remedy.” Opinion appears to have crystalized into two camps. One says that we have now to stop or sluggish the unfold of the illness in any respect prices. However I need to know, What are the prices?
The opposite camp focuses on the economic system, psychological well being, morbidity, longevity, and the cash obtainable for fixing long-term issues. This second camp argues that we should always ease up comparatively rapidly on insurance policies that discourage work and revenue and social interplay, in any other case we are going to severely injure the financial life that gives the assets to combat disasters like this, in addition to the on a regular basis wants that folks have.
The issue is that in any dichotomy like this, it appears to me to be poorly framed. There’s an optimum or steadiness someplace between the 2 extremes. You’ll want to steadiness your duty to the affected person in entrance of you and the well being of the society, together with future sufferers. Or serving to individuals sooner or later not develop into sufferers. For those who had been in control of this, what would you do? And why?
Okay, so I’m king for a day? First, due to all of the unknowns, I’d attempt to err extra on the facet of warning moderately than what the UK tried to do initially, which was to maintain a stiff higher lip and get to herd immunity as rapidly as doable. That coverage modified quickly as soon as they realized the surge it could produce on well being care assets.
So I feel I agree, there’s a rational center floor and that’s: We’ve got to first perceive if that is peaking. And bear in mind whenever you have a look at new case charges, you’re truly lagging by two weeks.
I’m conscious of that.
I’d have a look at these [new case rates], after which at hospitalizations and intensive care utilization, and see if that’s peaking as a result of that’s the most urgent drawback. Then I’d have a look at the charges by inhabitants density and see the place the wave is occurring extra regionally and usher assets there.
New York is a canary within the coal mine. However there are different locations: New Orleans, Washington, DC’s sort of arising. So I’d, to start with, mandate a standardized take a look at, everybody’s serum to see if they’ve antibodies towards COVID-19. Which means testing everybody, which might be impractical however . . .
To get a stratified pattern, couldn’t you take a look at a tenth of the inhabitants and even one one centesimal of the inhabitants, chosen to be consultant of your complete inhabitants?
Sure, I’d do an influence calculation to find out pattern dimension. That is an estimate of how correct your take a look at is and determines the minimal required pattern dimension wanted to realize statistical significance.
I’d do this with one standardized take a look at so we all know who’s already had the an infection and who hasn’t. That provides you rapid triage for who may go to work and who can’t. That is particularly essential for well being care suppliers as a result of, when you get one physician contaminated, it turns into a “care multiplier,” lowering the quantity of people that can attend to those that are sick. So well being care suppliers are actually not a fantastic inhabitants to contaminate.
Please proceed describing what you’d do.
I’d, first, get serology testing on a consultant inhabitants in a standardized take a look at. There are some complicating components, however this might get you a greater sense of who’s had the an infection, who’s over it, and who’s protected no less than for some time. We don’t learn about reinfection as a result of the biology of this illness is just 13 weeks outdated, however no less than these information provide you with a place to begin.
So the primary precedence is triage. You would wish serology testing — that’s, a take a look at counting on a blood pattern to determine neutralizing antibodies to the brand new coronavirus — to show that a person is already immune and never prone to get contaminated or infect others. Such individuals may return to work. The second is to take a look at the density of the aged and ensure assets are enough for that individual area — not simply tools and provides, however personnel. Lastly, I’d make investments actually closely within the primary biology and in vaccine improvement which is 2 years out. I feel you’re going to wish a vaccine and also you’ll in all probability want a brand new vaccine such as you do for the flu yearly. This virus will mutate.
Now all that takes cash, time, and coordination — however individuals are engaged on it and I feel, if we did that, we may kind of get again to the economic system being an economic system. In any other case we’re going to be within the Darkish Ages.
Sure — we’re going to develop into very poor in a short time. I used to be questioning: is there some kind of final phrase you’d like so as to add?
That is one other chapter within the viral wars on the human race. We’ve got had many assaults in previous eons. Immediately, luckily, we have now the instruments to higher characterize them on the molecular stage. Sooner or later, we should be earlier in turning into conscious of their arrival, to stop them from getting uncontrolled. We’ve got already eradicated another viruses from the world, together with smallpox and polio, that are just about gone. We now have vaccines for influenza, although they might be higher.
Given the advances in medical information and molecular biology, particularly within the final decade, and with the total focus of the world on this one problem — we are going to get via this.
For those who favored this submit, don’t overlook to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.
All posts are the opinion of the writer. As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially mirror the views of CFA Institute or the writer’s employer.
Picture credit score: ©Getty Photographs / Only5
Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members
CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can report credit simply utilizing their online PL tracker.