Arbitrage bot’s spam attack on the Polygon network generated $6,800 per day


The expansion of layer-two protocols has been one of many main tales of 2021 because the rising recognition of decentralized finance (DeFi) and nonfungible tokens (NFT) have pushed transaction prices greater on the Ethereum (ETH) community successfully pricing out many contributors. 

Earlier this yr the Polygon community, previously often called MATIC, emerged as one of many high contenders within the race for an efficient Ethereum layer-2 scaling resolution, and the challenge’s QuickSwap DeFi platform was additionally one of many extra profitable Uniswap clones.

Related articles

The platform was fairly standard initially however as different platforms like Arbitrum and Optimism popped up, discussions about Polygon fell to the wayside and a few merchants even confer with the platform as “sluggish”. Knowledge from Flipside Crypto reveals that the low-cost capabilities of the Polygon community got here underneath assault after a cleverly devised arbitrage bot managed flip 14 Ether in 218.5 Ether in lower than 4 months.

The bot stuffed every block with “meaningless transactions”

In line with data from Flipside Crypto, the assault started in early Might and at one level in June, pushed transactions on the Polygon community went as excessive as 8 million per day. In the identical timeframe, the utmost variety of transactions on the Ethereum community was at 1.2 million.

Arbitrage bot’s spam attack on the Polygon network generated $6,800 per day
Variety of transactions on Ethereum vs. Polygon. Supply: Flipside Crypto

Knowledge discovered on a Polygon discussion board signifies that the attacker has been inflating transaction volumes by as a lot as 90% by stuffing every block filled with “meaningless transactions” whereas solely having to pay round 0.02 MATIC to spam the whole block and roughly $1,000 for a whole day.

A deeper dive into the transactions and addresses interacting on the community revealed that round 30% of the community’s transaction rely was coming from two contracts which have been decided to be arbitrage bots that conduct hundreds of each day transactions to numerous decentralized exchanges (DEX).

The precise purpose why the spammer selected to fill every block when the bots had been solely conducting 2,000 – 4,000 trades per day is unsure, however one idea is that it was completed in an effort to stop anybody else from entrance operating the commerce.

Associated: Polygon can hit $3.50 in Q4 as MATIC’s 20% weekly rally triggers bull flag setup

The bot netted $6,800 in common each day revenue

Over a interval of 120 days, the bot was in a position to develop an preliminary quantity of 14 Ether to 218.5 Ether, which is at the moment value $813,694.

That works out to a median each day of revenue roughly $6,800 earlier than together with the associated fee to spam the community.

In response to the spammer, the group behind Polygon finally determined to extend the minimal value of a transaction from 1 gwei to 30 gwei as a approach to struggle spam and enhance community well being.

The transfer seems to have achieved its supposed purpose as data offered by Delphi Digital reveals that the spike in common transaction prices coincided with a marked decline within the variety of each day transactions as a result of it now prices $30,000 to spam the community for a whole day.

Arbitrage bot’s spam attack on the Polygon network generated $6,800 per day
Polygon common fuel value vs. each day transaction rely. Supply: Delphi Digital

Community information reveals that the spam transactions have dropped from 2 million to 500,000 transactions per day, a lower of 75%, however they nonetheless account for 16.7% of each day transactions. Which means that the bots are spending roughly $5,000 of their each day $6,800 revenue on fuel to maintain the scheme operating.

The views and opinions expressed listed here are solely these of the creator and don’t essentially mirror the views of Each funding and buying and selling transfer includes threat, it is best to conduct your individual analysis when making a choice.